Responsibilities of Academic Employees
Safety
A faculty member is responsible for the safety of students and employees under his/her supervision. Besides insuring that appropriate safeguards are in effect, faculty are responsible for insuring that proper medical attention is given when an injury occurs and for completing, where applicable, the required accident report forms.
Personal Liability of University Employees
Section #17 - Indemnification of Officers and Employees of the State
Reference: New York Public Officers Law
Article 7A (1977) of the State Finance Law allows any citizen, whether or not specially aggrieved, to bring an action against an officer or employee of the State who in the course of his/her duties has caused, is now causing, or is about to cause, a wrongful expenditure, misappropriation or any other illegal or unconstitutional disbursement of State funds or property. The statute permits the courts to require the offending employee to make restitution to the State for the value of the funds or other property unlawfully expended.
The following is a normal distribution of the responsibility of Teaching Faculty:
1. Effective instruction is the primary responsibility of the teaching faculty. This includes:
2. Participation in:
3. Professional Development
4. College Responsibilities
Academic Employee Workload
Because of the diversity of requirements and demands arising from different programs and courses, it is not feasible to attempt to specify in terms of numbers of hours, students, and preparations, what an academic employee's workload should be. It is more appropriate under the circumstances to establish guidelines to be followed in establishing total workload. This total workload shall be determined by consultation between the academic employee and Dean and/or Department Chairperson. The following are offered as guidelines:
Board of Trustees Appointments, Reappointments, Promotion and Evaluation (Process) for Academic Employees
Initial Appointment
A person who is appointed to a professional title in which permanent appointment may
be granted, must be granted a temporary appointment for the first year of that person’s
employment in such title when the appointment is made to a position vacated by a professional
employee who is serving a probationary appointment pursuant to Title C, section 5,
or Title D, section 6; otherwise the person shall be granted term appointment, except
where a temporary appointment is appropriate. Upon completion of the initial temporary
or term appointment, the professional employee may be granted a further appointment
in accordance with this Article. Service in a temporary appointment pursuant to this
section shall be counted toward the satisfaction of the eligibility requirements for
initial permanent appointment
Service Credit will be granted for continuing appointment base on guidelines in Policies of the Board of Trustees of the State University, Article XI, Title B, #3 (d) which states:
Service Credit
(1) In determining eligibility for continuing appointment under subdivision (b) of
this section, satisfactory full-time prior service in academic rank at another accredited
academic institution of higher education may, at the request of the appointee and
in the discretion of the Chancellor, or designee, be credited as service, up to a
maximum of three years, at the time of appointment at a college. Waiver of all or
part of this service credit shall be granted upon written request of the employee
to the chief administrative officer not later than six months after the date of initial
appointment. (2) In computing consecutive years of service for the purposes of appointment
or reappointment to the academic staff, periods of leave of absence at full salary
shall be included; periods of leave of absence at partial salary or without salary
and periods of part-time service shall not be included, but shall not be deemed an
interruption of otherwise consecutive service.
An academic employee's appointment, reappointment, promotion and evaluation are made on an individual basis in accordance with:
Purpose
The primary purpose of the evaluation system is self-improvement. Evaluation is also an integral part of the decision involving promotion and/or reappointment. The evaluation and subsequent recommendation of academic employees is primarily the responsibility of School Deans/Director of the Library after consultation with the Department Chairperson, if applicable. In cases of continuing appointment, the department must meet to review and recommend appointment.
Professional growth conferences shall take place at the request of the Dean, the Department Chairperson, the Director of the Library, or the academic employee. These conferences may occur as frequently as deemed appropriate and mutually convenient. A written summary of the personal conference shall be filed in the academic employee's personnel folder in the office of the Dean or Director of the Library, and in the official personnel file.
Evaluation for reappointment
Evaluation for reappointment shall take place each year the academic employee is eligible for reappointment. The evaluation will be completed prior to notification of change of contract status. An academic employee will be provided with a copy of the evaluation after the evaluation is discussed with the employee.
Evaluation for promotion
Academic employees seeking promotion must first be declared eligible for consideration. A completed “Promotion Eligibility Form” shall be submitted to the Department Chair by the third (3rd) Monday in November.
After eligibility for promotion is verified by the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs, the approved form is returned to the academic employee with a copy to the Dean.
To complete the application process, the academic employee must submit a full and complete portfolio in accordance with the criteria and guidelines contained in the Faculty Handbook to the Provost/Vice President for Academic Affairs no later than the first Monday in April.
Timetable for Reappointments | |||
---|---|---|---|
Faculty Year of Employment | |||
Reappointment Steps to Take | 1 Year | 2 Years | More than 2 years |
Dept/School evaluation sent to Provost/VP for Academic Affairs | 2nd Monday December | 2nd Monday October | 2nd Monday March |
Provost/VP for Academic Affairs forwards evaluation materials to APPC by | January 20 | November 1 | March 30 |
Faculty members review folder during | 2nd week February | 2nd week November | 1st week April |
APPC reports to President by | February 15 | November 15 | May 1 |
President's letter to faculty if non-renewal not later than | March 1 | December 1 | August 31 |
Letter of Intent | June 3 | June 3 | June 3 |
Written notice that a term appointment is not to be renewed upon expiration is to be given to the appointee by the President or his/her representative as soon as possible and not less than: Three months prior to the end of a term expiring at the end of such employee's first year of service within the University, but not later than March 1 for terms ending in June or August;
Six months prior to the end of a term expiring after the completion of one, but not more than, two years of service within the University, but not later than December 15 for terms ending in June, July, or August, and;
Twelve months prior to the expiration of a term after two or more years of service with the University.
At the beginning of each academic year, the Office of Human Resources will publish for academic employees a complete list of all promotions and appointments.
Criteria for Reappointment, Continuing Appointment,
and Promotion
(Approved by the Faculty 3/28/13)
The new criteria will be applied to Faculty members hired after the recommendations are approved by the Faculty (approved 3/28/13) and subsequently implemented by the administration (approved 6/3/13). Faculty hired before this date will be evaluated according to the current criteria in the 2007 Faculty Handbook for period of five (5) years, after which the new criteria will apply. The 2007 Handbook does not require a terminal degree for promotion to the higher ranks. As we do not wish to disadvantage current faculty and as the new guidelines do require a terminal degree for promotion beyond Assistant Professor/Senior Assistant Librarian, the 5-year grandfathering period is intended to allow current faculty reasonable time to earn promotion under the 2007 guidelines. Current faculty will not lose earned rank or continuing appointment at the end of the 5-year period. Faculty hired before June 2013 may choose to waive his/her right to a grandfathering period and be evaluated according to the new criteria immediately if they so wish. A letter to the Provost, copied to the faculty member’s Dean and Department Chair, will suffice.
The guidelines consist of minimum eligibility requirements for each rank, followed by evaluation criteria in the areas of teaching/librarianship, scholarship, and service. An Advancement Evaluation table summarizing necessary ratings for advancement through the ranks is included, as is a new process for those wishing to appeal denial of reappointment, continuing appointment, or promotion.
Eligibility for Faculty Ranks
Lecturer
The position of Lecturer signifies that an individual is an effective educator in his or her specialty area. A Lecturer will have experience in the field of specialization, or have established a reputation in the discipline. A minimum of a bachelor’s degree in the discipline is required.
Instructor | Assistant Librarian
The rank of Instructor/Assistant Librarian signifies that an individual is an effective educator/librarian in his or her specialty area. Minimum qualification for the rank of Instructor is a master’s degree. A bachelor’s degree with specialization in the discipline is acceptable when the candidate has an established reputation in the field. Minimum qualification for the rank of Assistant Librarian is a master’s degree from an ALA-accredited program in the field of information studies or directly related field.
Assistant Professor | Senior Assistant Librarian
The rank of Assistant Professor/Senior Assistant Librarian signifies that an individual is an effective educator/librarian in his or her specialty area and has demonstrated ability as a teacher/librarian. An Assistant Professor/Senior Assistant Librarian will have an earned doctorate or appropriate terminal degree in his or her discipline as determined by his or her department, or have completed all requirements for a doctorate but the dissertation (ABD), or have a master’s degree with specialization in the field.
Associate Professor | Associate Librarian
The rank of Associate Professor/Associate Librarian signifies that an individual is an outstanding educator/librarian, an emerging scholar, and has a strong record of service to the College and the profession. At minimum, an Associate Professor/Associate Librarian will have an earned doctorate or appropriate terminal degree in his or her discipline as determined by his or her department, or have completed all requirements for a doctorate but the dissertation (ABD). It is preferred that the candidate also have six (6) years at SUNY Cobleskill or elsewhere at the rank of Assistant Professor/Senior Assistant Librarian.
Professor | Librarian
The rank of Professor signifies that an individual is an outstanding educator/librarian, an established scholar, and has a sustained record of service to the College and the profession. A Professor /Librarian will have an earned doctorate or appropriate terminal degree in his or her discipline as determined by his or her department. It is preferred that the candidate also have six (6) years at SUNY Cobleskill or elsewhere at the rank of Associate Professor/Associate Librarian and a minimum of twelve (12) years of teaching/librarianship experience.
Areas of Evaluation
Teaching/Librarianship
Criteria for Evaluating Teaching
Criteria for Evaluating Librarianship
The above criteria are meant to be illustrative not definitive. Documentation of the criteria may include but is not limited to: evaluations by peers and supervisors; librarianship-related awards; development of internal library materials; and development of new programs and services.
Scholarship
Scholarship in higher education can result from a diverse set of activities including but not limited to research, publications, seminars, workshops, creative achievements, exhibition, and intellectual involvement in professional organizations or societies. The principal defining outcome of scholarship is the advancement of a body of knowledge and/or its application through a peer-adjudicated process.
Criteria for Evaluating Scholarship
The above criteria are meant to be illustrative not definitive. Evidence of publication and research can include but is not limited to: journal articles; books; book chapters and reviews; off-campus presentation of scholarly papers; partnerships; and other peer-reviewed research activities.
Service
Service is the demonstration of leadership, involvement, and sharing of expertise with the College, the University, Community, and the Profession.
Criteria for Evaluating Service
Advancement Evaluation Table
Ratings on evaluation forms are as follows: Minimally Effective, Effective, and Highly Effective
Advancement Sought… |
Criteria Evaluations Required in Teaching/Librarianship, Scholarship, Service… |
Earn reappointment or continuing appointment while Assistant Professor / Senior Assistant Librarian or promotion to Assistant Professor / Senior Assistant Librarian | No less than one-half of all ratings at the Effective level |
Earn reappointment or continuing appointment while Associate Professor / Associate Librarian or promotion to Associate Professor / Associate Librarian | No less than two-thirds of all ratings at the Effective level |
Earn promotion to Professor / Librarian | No less than two-thirds of all ratings at the Highly Effective level |
Appeals
Faculty wishing to appeal denial of reappointment, continuing appointment*, or promotion have two (2) weeks following the receipt of notification to submit a letter requesting a review to the Chair/s of the Academic Personnel Policies Committee. The letter should be copied to the Presiding Officer of the Faculty, Department Chair, Dean, Provost, and President.(*If denial of continuing appointment is eligible for review under Article 33 of the UUP contract, that takes precedence and this appeals process does not apply.)
A tripartite Appeals Panel of tenured faculty shall be formed within one (1) month during the academic year. The Presiding Officer of the Faculty picks one member of the panel, the denied faculty member picks one member, and APPC picks the third. The panel then selects a chair (from the 3) and reviews all materials relevant to the case, including formal summary statements and copies of pertinent documents provided by the faculty member, administration, and APPC. Panel should request individual meetings with “all concerned” to conduct live interviews and consider testimony.
The recommendation of the Appeals Panel will be submitted to the President, with a copy to the faculty member, Department Chair, Dean, Provost, and APPC, no later than one (1) month following its initial meeting.
The President will respond to the individual requesting the appeal, with a copy to the Department Chair, Dean, Provost and APPC, no later than one (1) month following receipt of the Appeals Panel’s recommendation.
If the outcome of the appeal process goes against denied faculty member, that original decision, including any applicable timelines, shall stand.
Leave of Absence
Sabbatical Leave
Policy
Sabbatical leaves for professional development may be made available to members of the professional staff who meet the requirements set forth below. The objective of such leave is to increase an employee's value to the University and thereby improve and enrich its program. Such leave shall not be regarded as a reward for service nor as a vacation or rest period occurring automatically at stated intervals.
Purpose
Sabbatical leaves shall be granted for planned travel, study, formal education, research, writing or other experiences of professional value.
Eligibility
Academic employees having continuing appointments and College administrative officers not in a negotiating unit established pursuant to Article XIV of the Civil Service Law who have completed at least six consecutive years of service within the University or who, if they previously have had a sabbatical leave, have completed at least six consecutive years of service within the University from the date of return of their last sabbatical leave, shall be eligible for sabbatical leave. In computing consecutive years of service for the purpose of this section, periods of vacation leave and periods of sick leave with salary shall be included; periods of leaves of absences, other than vacation and sick leave with salary, and periods of part‑time service shall not be included, but shall not be deemed an interruption of otherwise consecutive service.
Terms and Conditions
Sabbatical leaves may be granted for periods of one year at rates not to exceed one‑half basic annual salary or for periods of one‑half year at rates not to exceed full basic annual salary. Eligible employees on sabbatical leave may, with the prior approval of the Chief Administrative Officer, accept fellowships, grants‑in‑aid, or earned income to assist in accomplishing the purposes of their leaves. In such cases, the Chief Administrative Officer may adjust the sabbatical leave salaries to reflect such income, either prior to or during the periods of such leaves, provided, however, that in no case shall sabbatical leave salary be reduced if total earnings are less than full salary
Applications
Applications for sabbatical leaves shall be submitted to the Chief Administrative Officer as far in advance as possible of the requested effective date of the leave, but in no event later than six months in advance of such date unless such requirement is expressly waived by the Chief Administrative Officer. Each application shall include a statement outlining the program to be followed while on sabbatical leave, indicating any prospective income, stating that the applicant will continue as a member of the professional staff for a minimum of one year upon return and stating that upon return, the applicant will submit to the Chief Administrative Officer a detailed report of professional activities and accomplishments while on sabbatical leave.
Approval
Consistent with provisions of Section 4 of this title, the Chief Administrative Officer may approve each sabbatical leave as he or she deems appropriate and such leave shall be reported to the Chancellor.
Leave Credits
Vacation leave and sick leave credits shall not be accrued or used during sabbatical leave.
Procedures for Applying for Sabbatical Leave:
Application for Sabbatical Leave (pg 102)
Title F. Other Leaves
Approval
employees at full or reduced salary, or may grant employees leaves of absence without salary, for the purpose of professional development, acceptance of assignments of limited duration with other universities and colleges, governmental agencies, foreign nations, private foundations, corporations and similar agencies, as a faculty member, expert, consultant or in a similar capacity, or for other appropriate purposes consistent with the needs and interests of the University. Leave of absence without salary may also be granted under appropriate circumstances, for the purpose of child care. Leaves of absence at full or reduced salary pursuant to provisions of this section shall be subject to the approval of the Chancellor, and such leaves granted shall be reported to the Board of Trustees.
Application
Applications for such leaves of absence shall be made to the chief administrative officer. Each such application shall include a statement of the purpose for which the leave is requested, its anticipated duration and its values to the applicant and the University.
Leave Credits
Vacation leave and sick leave credits shall not be accrued or used during a period of leave pursuant to provisions of this section.
Guidelines for Professional Credits
Requests for Professional Credit are limited to twelve (12) credits for any one activity for the following reasons:
Types of experience for which professional credits may be granted - these activities are supplemental to and not in lieu of formal academic study:
Types of experience for which professional credits cannot be granted:
Credit Programs - any program, seminar or experience carrying regular academic credit.
High School Equivalency - programs leading to the high school equivalency certificate or diploma.
Orientation Programs - educational programs which deal in such internal topics as orientation in rights, benefits and responsibilities, organizational structure; or on‑the‑job methods, processes or procedures
Committee Meetings - committee activities
Policy Assignments - conferences, delegate assemblies, or similar meetings for policy‑making purposes.
Meetings and Conventions - meetings and conventions of societies and associations do not qualify, per se, as continuing education. Educational activities programmed independently and held concurrently with these meetings may meet the criteria for waiver.
Mass Media Programs - casual participation in programs delivered through the media such as television, radio, newspapers do not qualify.
Entertainment and Recreation - attendance at lecture series, cultural performances, entertainment or recreational meetings or activities, and participation in travel groups do not qualify unless these activities are an integral part of a larger educational program.
Self‑Directed Studies - individual, self‑directed studies or other forms of independent learning experiences that are not subject to later verification.
Procedures for Application
Proposal Review Procedures for Requests of More than Three (3) Professional Credits
For requests of more than three (3) professional credits, an outline of the proposed professional activity should be presented to the School Dean or Dean of the Library and the Academic Faculty Personnel Policies Committee for review PRIOR TO THE ACTIVITY.
The application shall be submitted, in writing, to the School Dean or Dean of the Library. The Application for Professional Credit form should be used.
If the Dean approves the proposal, it will be forwarded to the APPC with the Dean's signature. If the proposal is not approved, it shall be returned to the faculty with an explanation.
The APPC will review the proposal forwarded by the Dean. If there are any problems, the APPC will contact the faculty member and the Dean to resolve the issues. When the APPC is satisfied that the proposal meets the guidelines, it will be signed by the chair and a copy returned to the faculty member and the Dean.
After the project is completed, the faculty member will follow the normal procedures for professional credit application as outlined below.
Application for Professional Credit
One Professional Credit (PC) equals 30 hours of participation in an organized continuing education experience under responsible sponsorship, capable direction, and qualified instruction. For programs awarding CEUs, 3 CEU = 1 PC. In non-CEU programs, "participation" should be defined as combinations of in-class instruction and out-of-class preparation, with the minimum in-class instruction totaling 15 hours.
For example, 1 PC = 30 hours instruction; or 20 hours instruction, + 10 hours preparation; or
15 hours instruction, + 15 hours preparation.
Some guidelines that can be used in determining the number of professional credits granted:
Credit recommendations as listed in:
Learning Activity |
Professional Credits Granted |
Weekend Workshop (substantial in content) | 1/2 to 1 |
Week-Long Workshop | 1 to 2 |
Semester Full-time Work experience | Up to 12 |
Published article | Up to 3 |
Published manual or book | Up to 12 |
Chapter in a professional book | Up to 4 |
The School Dean or the Dean of the Library will forward the application, along with their recommendation, to the Chairperson of the Academic Faculty Personnel Policies Committee. In addition, a copy of this recommendation will be sent to the faculty member.
Evaluation of Applications
The Academic Personnel Policies Committee will review the application and will make a recommendation to the President concerning the acceptability of the proposal and the number of professional credits to be granted (copy to Dean and Director of the Library and the faculty member). CEU’s earned outside of the Cobleskill Campus must be petitioned for acceptance. If additional input is required, it will be requested by the committee.
Definition – Continuing Education Units (CEU’s)
The Continuing Education Unit (CEU) is an internationally recognized measure of participation in a continuing professional education program. One continuing Education Unit (1.0) is defined as “Ten contact hours of participation in organized continuing education experience under responsible, qualified direction”. (International Association for Continuing Education and Training, Criteria and Guidelines for Quality Continuing Education and Training Programs, 1998)
The faculty member will receive final written notification from the President concerning the number of professional credits granted by. A copy of this decision will be placed in the applicant's personnel file.
Credits that are to be used to meet promotion requirements must have been granted prior to the deadline for promotion application.
One professional credit shall be equivalent to one graduate hour in promotion requirements. Professional credits may be substituted for not more than ten (10) semester hours of graduate credit at the level of Assistant Professor, twenty (20) at the level of Associate Professor and thirty (30) at the level of Professor.
Thirty (30) hours are the maximum number of credits that may be substituted by a faculty member.
Once professional credits are used for a promotion, they cannot be used again for a second promotion.
Application for Professional Credit (pg 110)
◄ Part I - Governance - Section 4 Back to Top Section 2.2 ►